This page was translated automatically from Turkish. Read the original
This page is an AI-assisted Turkish summary of the study presented at the 26th World Congress of Psychiatry. The study belongs to the presenting authors; please refer to the original source when citing it.
SO428
Should patients be informed about the negative effects of psychotherapy? A mixed-methods study of attitudes in the general population
SHOULD PATIENTS BE INFORMED ABOUT NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF PSYCHOTHERAPY? A MIXED-METHODS STUDY OF ATTITUDES AMONG THE GENERAL PUBLIC
Presenter: Alexander Rozental
Country: Sweden
Institution: Luleå University of Technology, Department of Health, Education and Technology
Session: 4520 - PARALLEL SHORT ORAL POSTER SESSIONS: PSYCHOTHERAPY
Date: Sat, 26.09.2026
Most individuals in the general population support disclosure of the potential negative effects of psychotherapy.
The aim of the study was to examine attitudes in the general population toward receiving information about the potential negative effects of psychotherapy (deterioration, nonresponse, or newly emerging symptoms) and to explore preferences regarding whether and how this information should be communicated. A mixed-methods study was conducted via an online survey of adults from the general population in Sweden. The sample comprised 500 individuals, with a mean age of 38.2 years and an age range of 19–78; 77% were women and 23% were men, 64.6% were employed, and 77% had experience of psychotherapy. Quantitative items were examined using descriptive and correlational analyses, while open-ended responses were examined using thematic analysis. Attitudes toward being informed about potential negative effects were positive in 52%, somewhat positive in 20%, neutral in 18%, somewhat negative in 6%, and negative in 4%. Willingness to begin treatment after receiving this information was distributed as follows: 19% willing, 35% somewhat willing, 25% neutral, 18% somewhat unwilling, and 4% unwilling (the conference abstract also reported that 72% of participants preferred to be informed and that 66.2% wanted this information before starting treatment). In the qualitative analysis, insight into the treatment process, increased preparedness, and building trust emerged as positive themes, while concerns included the possibility that the information might increase anxiety, worry, or symptom focus (the nocebo effect), as well as hesitation about treatment or reduced motivation. In conclusion, most individuals support disclosure of the potential negative effects of psychotherapy, and these findings highlight the importance of integrating balanced information about risks and benefits into informed consent procedures.
View the original posterHow to cite this study
APA 7: Rozental, A., et al. (2026, September 26). Should patients be informed about negative effects of psychotherapy? a mixed-methods study of attitudes among the general public [Poster presentation]. 26th WPA World Congress of Psychiatry (WCP 2026), Stockholm, Sweden. https://cslide.ctimeetingtech.com/wcp26/attendee/eposter/file/563
Vancouver: Rozental A, et al. Should patients be informed about negative effects of psychotherapy? a mixed-methods study of attitudes among the general public [poster]. 26th WPA World Congress of Psychiatry (WCP 2026); 2026 Sep 23-26; Stockholm, Sweden. Available from: https://cslide.ctimeetingtech.com/wcp26/attendee/eposter/file/563
Author names and title formatting were generated automatically from the congress system; please check them against the original poster before use.
On the same topic
- Bağımlılığa veda mektubu: madde kullanım bozukluğu tedavisinde eksik parça
- Hemşirelik stajyerlerinde katarsis programının algılanan stres üzerindeki etkisi: girişimsel bir çalışma
- Sınav kaygısı odaklı bilişsel davranışçı terapi el kitabının lise kız öğrencilerinde incelenmesi
- Sosyal anksiyete bozukluğunda BDT sonucunun yordayıcıları olarak öngörü hatası ve beklentiler
- Kabul ve kararlılık terapisinin öğrencilerin algılanan stresi ve sınav kaygısı üzerindeki etkisi