This page was translated automatically from Turkish. Read the original
This page is an AI-assisted Turkish summary of the study presented at the 26th World Congress of Psychiatry. The study belongs to the presenting authors; please refer to the original source when citing it.
Health economic evaluation of the Danish IBBIS randomized controlled trials
Health economic evaluation of the danish ibbis randomized controlled trials
Presenter: Andreas Hoff
Country: Denmark
Session: 4160 - FREE COMMUNICATIONS 16: PUBLIC HEALTH & EMERGENCY PSYCHIATRY
Date: Fri, 25.09.2026, 18:40 - 18:50
Room: Hall K11
The IBBIS interventions, which integrated healthcare with vocational rehabilitation, were not found to be cost-effective compared with usual services, with negative economic outcomes in both intervention arms.
Common mental disorders (CMD), including depression, anxiety, and stress-related disorders, affect approximately 20% of the adult population and have a substantial impact on labor force participation and productivity; the IBBIS trials aimed to evaluate the health economic impact of integrating healthcare with vocational rehabilitation for these individuals. Two parallel randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted among adults who had been on sick leave for at least four weeks and had been diagnosed with anxiety, depression, or a stress-related disorder; participants were randomized to three groups: Service As Usual (SAU), IBBIS Mental Health Care (MHC), and the IBBIS Integrated Intervention (INT). Data were collected from Danish national registers (healthcare services, vocational rehabilitation, and social benefit transfers), and economic outcomes were analyzed over a 24-month follow-up from both societal and public budget perspectives. Both IBBIS interventions showed a negative economic impact compared with SAU: at 24 months, the per-participant impact from a societal perspective was −€4,645 for INT and −€7,680 for MHC; from a public budget perspective, it was −€2,994 for INT and −€5,831 for MHC. The main driver was reduced productivity, with no significant improvement in health-related quality of life to offset it. The interventions were not cost-effective; highlighting the economic challenges of current interventions for common mental disorders, the authors note that developing and testing new approaches that address both health and vocational outcomes remains an unresolved area of research.
How to cite this study
APA 7: Hoff, A., et al. (2026, September 25). Health economic evaluation of the danish ibbis randomized controlled trials [Oral presentation]. 26th WPA World Congress of Psychiatry (WCP 2026), Stockholm, Sweden.
Vancouver: Hoff A, et al. Health economic evaluation of the danish ibbis randomized controlled trials [oral presentation]. 26th WPA World Congress of Psychiatry (WCP 2026); 2026 Sep 23-26; Stockholm, Sweden.
Author names and title formatting were generated automatically from the congress system; please check them against the original poster before use.
On the same topic
- Birleşik Krallık'ta COVID sonrası DEHB ile ilgili arama ilgisinde orantısız artış
- Brezilyalı üniversite öğrencilerinde dikkat eksikliği/hiperaktivite belirtilerinin yaşam tarzı ve anksiyete bağıntıları: UNILIFE çok merkezli kohort bulguları
- Sendemik kuramının evsizlik, ruhsal hastalık, madde kullanımı ve suçlulukla ilişkisine uygulanması: bir kapsam derlemesi
- Ruh sağlığı hizmetlerine başvuru zamanlaması ve genç erişkinlikte işgücü piyasasından dışlanma: Finlandiya kayıt temelli çalışması
- Birinci sınıf üniversite öğrencilerinde depresyon ve birikimli olumsuz yaşantılar: Kenya üniversitelerinden bulgular