This page was translated automatically from Turkish. Read the original

This page is an AI-assisted Turkish summary of the study presented at the 26th World Congress of Psychiatry. The study belongs to the presenting authors; please refer to the original source when citing it.

EV0972

E-PosterDigital Psychiatry and Artificial IntelligenceComparative content analysis

A Comparative Analysis of Shifts in Subjectivity in Depression Discourse

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SUBJECTIVITY SHIFTS IN DEPRESSION DISCOURSE

Presenter: Inhee Cho

Country: Korea, Republic of

Institution: WIM Clinic, Keyo Hospital

A comparison of online depression discourse six years apart found a decline in emotional and expert-dependent narratives and an increase in functioning-oriented and self-managing narratives.

The study aims to trace how subjectivity in depression discourse evolved between two time points, specifically the shift from narratives of emotional suffering to narratives of productivity and instrumental self-management. A comparative content analysis was conducted on approximately 2,250 online comments, using Python-based natural language processing (NLP) to code each comment by narrative type (emotional or functional) and model of subjectivity (active manager or passive patient). The proportion of functional narratives among coded comments rose from 16.10% to 25.45%, with depression increasingly framed as a disruption to daily routines and work performance. The active manager model, in which diagnosis is used as a tool for self-improvement, nearly doubled from 5.93% to 10.03%. In the earlier dataset, emotional narratives (17.80%) and passive patient framing (13.98%) were more prevalent, centering on dependence on experts and inner suffering. The authors interpret the findings as a shift toward functional medicalization, in which depression is viewed less as an emotional state and more as an obstacle to social productivity. The stated limitations are that the analysis relies on publicly available online comments from two time points and that the findings are exploratory; future research should incorporate intermediate time points, multiple platforms, and qualitative validation of the coding scheme.

View the original poster

How to cite this study

APA 7: Cho, I., et al. (2026, September 23-26). A comparative analysis of subjectivity shifts in depression discourse [E-poster]. 26th WPA World Congress of Psychiatry (WCP 2026), Stockholm, Sweden. https://cslide.ctimeetingtech.com/wcp26/attendee/eposter/file/92

Vancouver: Cho I, et al. A comparative analysis of subjectivity shifts in depression discourse [e-poster]. 26th WPA World Congress of Psychiatry (WCP 2026); 2026 Sep 23-26; Stockholm, Sweden. Available from: https://cslide.ctimeetingtech.com/wcp26/attendee/eposter/file/92

Author names and title formatting were generated automatically from the congress system; please check them against the original poster before use.

All WCP 2026 summaries

Sitenin son güncellemesi: 8 Kasım 2026 · Site editörü: Doç. Dr. Alişan Burak Yaşar, info@alisanburak.com