This page was translated automatically from Turkish. Read the original

This page is an AI-assisted Turkish summary of the study presented at the 26th World Congress of Psychiatry. The study belongs to the presenting authors; please refer to the original source when citing it.

EV0666

The Telemachus injunction: Judicializing mental ecology under Article 8 of the ECHR

THE TELEMACHIAN DECREE: JUSTICIATING THE MENTAL ECOLOGY UNDER ARTICLE 8 ECHR

The failure to provide a structured Tier 3 community mental health service in Northern Ireland is treated as an actionable breach of the state's obligation to protect psychological integrity under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The study discusses whether the absence of a structured Tier 3 community-based mental health service in Northern Ireland constitutes a breach of the state's positive obligation to protect psychological integrity under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Its theoretical framework draws on Guattari's concept of mental ecology—an approach that treats the individual psyche not as an isolated biological entity but as an ecosystem requiring explicit legal protection against institutional neglect and chemical substitution—and Recalcati's Lacanian formulation of Telemachus, positioning psychoanalysis as an interpretive tool for public law. The methodology combines an interdisciplinary synthesis based on the triangulation of public health data, human rights case law, and post-Lacanian psychoanalysis with doctrinal and ecosystemic analysis mapping the intersection between post-conflict vulnerability and gaps in Tier 3 psychiatric services. The materials used include regional prescribing metrics (benzodiazepine prescribing rates in Northern Ireland being 3.5 times those in England), Article 8 ECHR case law on positive obligations to protect psychological integrity, the human rights commitments of the 1998 Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement, and texts by Guattari (1989), Recalcati (2013), and Green (2001), alongside the ECHR (1950). The findings suggest that ECHR case law reveals an unjustified hierarchy in which physical integrity is actively protected while psychological integrity is relegated to a secondary position; the systemic absence of therapeutic containment leads to psychic decathexis (Green) and chemical negative hallucination through prescribed or illicit sedatives. The author argues that leaving individuals without containment in a post-conflict setting crosses the Article 8 threshold, transforming what is often regarded as a matter of policy discretion into an actionable legal breach; applying Article 8 of the ECHR to Guattari's mental ecology elevates Tier 3 mental health care to the status of an enforceable human right guaranteed under the Good Friday Agreement.

All WCP 2026 summaries