This page was translated automatically from Turkish. Read the original
← Back to blogIf you don't make it a problem, it won't be one: a metacognitive therapy (MCT) perspective
🧠 What turns a thought into a problem is often not the thought itself, but our repeated response to it. Metacognitive therapy (MCT) focuses on precisely this: not what we think, but how we relate to our thoughts.
The Cognitive Attentional Syndrome (CAS), defined by Wells, consists of three processes occurring together: worry, rumination, and threat monitoring. When these three work together, attention remains locked onto the thought labeled "dangerous"; this reinforces the thought rather than resolving it.
📊 In a randomized, single-blind clinical trial involving adults diagnosed with depression, the recovery rate following metacognitive therapy was 74%, compared with 52% for cognitive behavioral therapy; this difference persisted at the six-month follow-up. A separate meta-analysis shows that trying to suppress a thought can increase how often it returns rather than silence it.
🔑 In everyday life, this means noticing and labeling a thought rather than trying to push it away, deliberately directing attention outward, postponing worry to a fixed time rather than trying to silence it completely, and asking yourself, "Is engaging with this thought solving the problem?"
This content does not constitute diagnostic or treatment advice.
Sources: Wells (2019, Frontiers in Psychology) · Callesen ve ark. (2020, Scientific Reports) · Stenzel ve ark. (2025, Psychological Medicine) · Bailey (2025, Psychological Medicine) · Abramowitz ve ark. (2001, Clinical Psychology Review) · Myers ve Solem (2026, Frontiers in Psychiatry) · Dippel ve ark. (2023, International Journal of Cognitive Therapy) · Haukaas ve ark. (2018, Frontiers in Psychology)